December 22, 2024

Hagar: a woman for all seasons

Genesis 16. 1-16;  Genesis 21 8-21

One of my students did a research project on the lives of marginalised women in Addis Ababa. She found that few of the group she engaged with had any knowledge of the Bible or much contact with Christianity. So, she asked the group leader to read some bible stories about women with them, to find out what they thought. When they got together afterwards she asked if they could identify with any of the women they had read about. Almost unanimously, the answer was yes, they could identify with Hagar.  

Hagar is in fact one of the key women in all the Abrahamic religions, and even today, many centuries after she was said to have lived, she is revered as the ancient matriarch of multiple Arab tribes. Yet that was not why these oppressed women identified with her. It was because her story is also one of the saddest and most disturbing in the Hebrew Scriptures.  

Hagar is first mentioned in the Genesis text in relation to the infertility of Sarah, wife of Abraham. Despite God’s promises that Abraham and his wife Sarah will become a great nation, Sarah remained childless.  Hagar was Sarah’s Egyptian slave, so she must have seen the distress this brought Sarah and probably felt sorry for her. Yet slaves existed simply to do the owner’s bidding and Sarah did not go to Hagar for sympathy. She had another purpose for Hagar which suited her far more.

Sarah had decided to take matters into her own hands. If she could not have her own baby, she would have one by surrogacy. She would use the womb of her slave. Hagar wasn’t asked what she thought of the project, or whether she minded having sex with Sarah’s husband. Her opinion was irrelevant. She was there to do the other woman’s bidding. Hagar’s sexuality, her womb belonged to Sarah to use as she saw fit.  So Hagar was sent to have sex with Abraham. It might not have been easy for Sarah to direct a younger, attractive woman into her husband’s bed, but it is clear that she did not then see Hagar as any kind of competitor. She was merely a function, and this was a practice often used by women like Sarah.  Before long, Hagar became pregnant. The plan had worked.

Or had it? Another issue emerged immediately. Sarah had not considered that conception might change Hagar’s status, but Hagar had succeeded where Sarah had failed, so a new level of tension entered the relationship. Sarah began to resent the slave and what she saw as her scornful attitude. Complaints to Abraham were heard with complete indifference: he told Sarah to handle it her way. She did. Sarah’s way was to mete out cruelty and oppression to the woman who had simply acted under her instructions. The injustice already suffered by Hagar was compounded by the brutality of her mistress. Fearing for her safety, it seemed the only option to the pregnant slave was to run away into the desert.

The sense of abandonment and rejection which Hagar experienced must have been acute. She had been treated as a commodity, not a person; she had been forced into an intimate relationship yet allowed no emotions or even identity of her own. Still reeling from the blows to her body, she was probably completely unprepared for what happened next. She heard the voice of an angel calling to her. God had seen her distress and wanted to encourage and bless her.

For Hagar, this experience by the water spring was life-changing. The angel told her that she would be the mother of descendants too numerous to count and prophesied over the baby in her womb.  She was told to return to Sarah and wait for her child to be born. Hagar slowly absorbed what was happening to her. Removed from the orbit of those who controlled her, she had found something much deeper than even human compassion. She had found a relationship with God. She testified out loud: ‘I have now seen the One who sees me.’ Her identity was no longer that of an Egyptian slave, but that of a woman who had experienced God’s presence. She was known for who she really was and was of significance in God’s covenant with his people. It was a new Hagar who went back to the household and resumed her service.

The relationship with Sarah did not improve, however, not even when Sarah had her own son, following a promise from angelic visitors. We might have thought that Sarah’s antipathy towards Hagar might have changed after the miracle of late childbirth had established her significance as a mother. But, given that Ishmael was Abraham’s older son, Sarah’s insecurity remained. Her husband could still prefer him. Now she demanded that Abraham banish both slave and son. This time her complaints touched Abraham more deeply. He cared about Ishmael; he was emotionally involved with the young lad. In his distress, he would probably have refused Sarah, had God not spoken and reinforced the need for Hagar and Ishmael to be sent away. So clutching the precious provisions of water from Abraham, Hagar once again became a fugitive in the desert, not fleeing this time of her own accord, but evicted from the household. Now all her anxiety was focussed on her boy. Abraham’s water ration was soon used up, and she felt powerless in the face of Ishmael’s need. She sobbed in anguish at the inevitability of his death in the desert.

But, yet again, Hagar found that God had seen her, and was caring for her. She found she was safer with God in the desert than with Sarah in Abraham’s household. And when God showed her the well of water which would keep Ishmael alive, it was symbolic of all the provisions God would make in their lives. Hagar and Ishmael would live in the Desert of Paran with God watching over Ishmael as he grew to become a skilled archer. They would not live in opulence, but would live under divine protection and Hagar would no longer be a slave but walk free. When it was time, she would return briefly to Egypt to find a wife for her son. And the sober prophecies spoken over him by the angel would come true. He would indeed father many people, yet would be known as a man of conflict and hostility with everyone’s hand against him.

Learning from Hagar’s story.

Hagar’s story is vital for understanding more about God, ourselves and the world we live in. When we look at the friction and tension which have so often marked the history of the Middle East, we can begin to learn the significance of prophecy. Ishmael was indeed the father of many tribal groups but as the angel foresaw, conflict and hostility have been endemic in political relationships across that region.  We learn too about the importance of monogamy as God’s plan for marriage. The polygamy in the relationships between Abraham, Sarah and Hagar not only distorts the one-flesh intimacy of marriage, but also increases the power of the man and the potential for jealousy and strife between competing wives. A third thing we learn is the strength of God’s heart for justice and his concern for those who are violated or exploited. The messages from this story are echoed in the warnings of the Prophets and of Jesus in the New Testament.  The evils and ugliness of slavery are exposed and its intersection with racism; the low value given to the girl from Egypt and her otherness making her vulnerable.  The wrongness of all forms of owning or controlling the lives of other people is writ large. In Hagar herself, we see reflections of so many other women subject to sexual exploitation, who, like her have no voice and no alternative but to comply. Her story reminds us again why trafficking and sex slavery are utterly wrong and must be combatted and eradicated.

But there are personal lessons too wrapped up in this story for us. We find that freedom is not always where we think it is. Hagar was a slave and Sarah was free, yet Sarah’s attempts to control others show she was in bondage to her wants and fears. When our wants take such priority in our lives, we too are no longer free. We find also in the story that feelings aren’t always the final arbiter. Hagar felt abandoned, powerless and isolated, but God found her, and gave purpose to her life.  We too can have feelings that overwhelm us and make us oblivious of God’s presence, yet God sees and knows the reality of our lives. In our darkest moments we are not alone; we can reach out to God and find in the bleakness his blessings and comfort. Whatever our fear and despair, when we encounter God’s deep, abiding love, we too can find that eventually, we’re able to walk down a new road to freedom.

Two Gospel angles on the visits of the angels.

Matthew 1 18-25;  Luke 1 26-36

We regularly come across angels in the run-up to Christmas. We see them in displays in shops and online stores, reminding us to buy our presents early. We scrutinise them on Christmas cards, wondering whether to go for classical or contemporary versions. Parents with primary school children will be kitting out their own little angels with wings for the school Nativity play. And most of us will recall again the angels’ part in the Nativity story, bringing Good News to the terrified shepherds and filling the skies with their angelic choir. Angels are seasonal visitors in the UK, showing up especially at this time of year.

Yet, in the biblical accounts, angels are on the scene months before Jesus is born. Nine months in fact. They are the ones who break the news to the two key players that they are about to become parents. Both Joseph and Mary receive a visit from an angel, and detailed account of these encounters are given in the Gospels. Yet, when we read those accounts we find they’re very different.  Even though the underlying news is the same – a baby is going to be born from a miraculous conception – the rest of the stories contrast with each other. In Matthew’s Gospel, the focus is on Joseph and he sees an angel when he is struggling with a decision. In Luke’s Gospel the focus is on Mary, and the angel s visit to her is completely out of the blue.  The stories are complementary rather than contradictory, but why are the accounts so different?

The answer lies in the authorship, and the intended readers. Matthew and Luke were very different people, writing about the events of Jesus’ life and death for different audiences and often from different perspectives. Matthew’s is the ‘Jewish Gospel’ written by someone who was part of a Christian Jewish community and who was learned in Jewish history and Hebrew scriptures.  Luke’s Gospel is authored by a Gentile doctor, who was particularly interested in people’s ailments and healings; he also wrote the Acts of the Apostles. And although in both of their accounts we find overlapping material from Mark, much of their narrative is also unique to each of them. This comes out very significantly in the way they present the visits of the angels.

 In Matthew ‘s Gospel the angel comes to Joseph in a dream. Joseph has already discovered that his fiancée is pregnant and since they had not had sexual relations, he knows for certain that the child is not his. So not surprisingly, his conclusion is that the woman he was betrothed to has been unfaithful. The dilemma for Joseph now is whether to make her adultery public, which could have had very serious consequences for Mary, or to quietly divorce her (betrothal was as binding as marriage). That would presumably leave her free to marry the baby’s father, if he were willing, or to go back to her own family. Having decided on the latter action, Matthew tells us that Joseph is then confronted by an angel in a dream. The angel brings him the news that his fiancée’s has not betrayed him but her pregnancy is miraculous; she has conceived through the power of the Holy Spirit. So the angel instructs Joseph neither to expose her as an adulteress nor to divorce her, but to continue into marriage and accept this child as from God. He further instructs Joseph as to what to name the child. The dream is quite brief and Joseph is unable to ask any questions, yet the encounter is so powerful that he is convinced by the angel. Matthew tells us that he responds by faithfully carrying out what he has been told to do.

In Luke’s Gospel, the angel comes to Mary before the start of her pregnancy. Luke tells us it’s the angel Gabriel and he appears in person to explain that Mary is to become a mother. Joseph does not feature at all in this account, except as an absent figure who has not had sex with his fiancée. Mary’s response is fear and confusion, not least because she knows she is a virgin. A conversation then takes place between her and the angel, where the angel gives her identical news to that given to Joseph -that her conception will be brought about by the power of the Holy Spirit. The angel then refers her to her elderly cousin, Elizabeth whose pregnancy, long after the age of conception is also miraculous, although of a different order. Mary finds the angel’s response reassuring, and confirms that she is God’s servant and willing to accept whatever God has planned for her.  

Notice how the gender demarcation in the two accounts is very evident. It also reflects the difference in the background of the authors. Matthew reports the story from Joseph’s point of view, because this is much more in line with the thinking in his Jewish community. The rights and responsibilities of Jewish men were well laid out. Husbands were the ones with authority in the family, making all decisions including naming the children. Only they could procure a divorce, and the penalties for an unfaithful wife were heavy ones. Twice elsewhere in his Gospel Matthew discusses divorce and shows how Jesus urges greater protection for women against husband who have the power of divorce. So Matthew’s readers would be well able to connect with Joseph’s dilemma.  From his description of Joseph’s kindness and concern, Matthew seems keen to offer him as a role model for men, even before he hears from the angel.

Luke helps us to see the events from Mary’s point of view. His narrative describes a very personal encounter between human and angelic being. Luke does not find it presumptuous of Mary to question Gabriel and in the conversation between them, Mary is not patronised. The angel gives her as many details about her conception as he has himself, but the baby’s future name is not given to her. Instead, through the reference to Elizabeth’s pregnancy, Luke shows an appreciation for the way women relate to each other. This is all very much in keeping with the rest of his Gospel. More than any other Gospel writer he demonstrates particular interest in women’s health and wellbeing and in their more vulnerable status. He is the one who highlights the women who travel with Jesus and support him financially. And all those concerns about women are reflected in this story of the angel’s visit.   

What do these stories mean to us today?

Matthew and Luke offer us two different cameos of visiting angels. Both writers recognize the significance of angels and their roles as God’s messengers. Together these two accounts  give us a richer picture not just of the miraculous conception of Jesus and of angels, but the gender differences embedded within the culture of the Gospels.

The stories help us today in several ways. First they challenge us to reflect more on the biblical narratives, and what we learn from their differences. Especially in the four Gospels, the areas of overlap and the areas of uniqueness are both important. They build up a powerful picture of God’s relationship with us. We never need to set the Gospel writers against each other, because the four authors are not competing or disagreeing.  There are many ways of telling a story and they each give us an authentic account of the life of Jesus, based on the testimony of eye witnesses.

The stories also help us to recognize the biblical truth about angels. That they are real. They are not products of our imagination. Nor are they part of the romantic fantasy world which we often see depicted in movies or in stories of the paranormal. They exist where God is at work in our normal everyday world. They still convey messages from God, they still release people from danger, still prompt and lead the praise of God’s people.

Many people claim to have seen angels and even though much may be wish-fulfilment, some testimonies are very powerful. After an emergency operation my father’s life was in the balance. I sat by his bedside as the doctors checked constantly, fearing his kidneys may have packed in, his coughing was pulling the wound, his blood pressure was sinking. With each piece of news, I phoned round our prayer supporters. As I prayed,  I slowly noticed a change; his coughing stopped, his breathing became easier and the tubes connected to his bladder began to fill with urine. He made a full recovery and lived for another 28 years. Afterwards he told me, with utter conviction, that an angel had accompanied him, sitting at the end of his bed, urging him to get better and giving him enormous peace.   

We might not always identify our sudden rescue from danger, or new powerful conviction as the work of an angel. But the Gospels assure us that angels are active even in our world today.

https://www.elainestorkey.com/485-2/

How to Spend Lent?

Time Out. Time inpraying2

Apparently #Lent has been trending on Twitter! I’m wondering what that says about the way Christians have taken up the challenge of social media. For the rest of Lent I am giving up Twitter, and Facebook too – not as any real act of self-denial, but more to reclaim time which has soaked away into self-indulgence over the past few months.

I can justify mild bouts of self-indulgence easily, of course. Days can be quite pressured, commitments often demanding at this stage of life. Four generations of family keep us very busy – from the ages of 19 months to 95 years!  There are close friends also who need time, folk who are wrestling with issues in  isolation, people who are facing despondency and disappointment. We have to be in this together; no-one should be left to struggle on their own. Then there are cases of justice to address, wrongs to highlight, causes to support. We know that all it takes for injustice to flourish is for people of good will to do nothing. Since I wrote my last book there have been many more invitations to speak, broadcast and write – all of which is encouraging  but these bring their own deadlines. So at the end of the day it is all too easy to log on to Facebook and Twitter and let time go by in pleasant surface engagement with streams of consciousness!

So, I’m giving it up; just for the rest of Lent. I’ll visit a few elderly neighbours who don’t have computers, let alone Twitter, and see friends in person rather than via screens. I’ll be present to people I am with, rather than elsewhere in my head. I’ll go to sleep at the end of the day, and not stray on to these sites in moments of weariness. And I’ll get into concentrated preparation for my own programme of speaking, so that I can build up new thought-capital rather than lazily rely on what is already there.

I’m hoping that those of you who are praying friends this Lent, might just offer a prayer for some of the events that I’m involved in, as well as your own. If you want me to pray for you, please post your requests below- or email me. I’d like this to become a bigger habit in my life. We all know that praying carries no guarantees. But I’m still ready to wager that time spent on my knees (metaphorically, as much of my praying is in transit!) might just make me – and those I pray for –  more effective citizens in the Kingdom of God.